19 Surprising Facts About the Deindustrialization of America

Conversation From The Corner Office
Posted by Rick Irrgang.
If you are wondering what is happening to this great country we live in, take a few minutes to read this short article I found today. The author is credited at the end of this post.
 I think our plan "B" better become our plan "A". Let's build a better life together.

The United States is rapidly becoming the very first "post-industrial" nation on the globe. All great economic empires eventually become fat and lazy and squander the great wealth that their forefathers have left them, but the pace at which America is accomplishing this is absolutely amazing.
It was America that was at the forefront of the industrial revolution. It was America that showed the world how to mass produce everything from automobiles, to televisions, to airplanes. It was the great American manufacturing base that crushed Germany and Japan in World War II.
But now we are witnessing the deindustrialization of America. Tens of thousands of factories have left the United States in the past decade alone. Millions upon millions of manufacturing jobs have been lost in the same time period. The United States has become a nation that consumes everything in sight and yet produces increasingly little.
Do you know what our biggest export is today? Waste paper. Yes, trash is the number one thing that we ship out to the rest of the world as we voraciously blow our money on whatever the rest of the world wants to sell to us. The United States has become bloated and spoiled and our economy is now just a shadow of what it once was.
Once upon a time America could literally outproduce the rest of the world combined. Today that is no longer true, but Americans sure do consume more than anyone else in the world. If the deindustrialization of America continues at this current pace, what possible kind of a future are we going to be leaving to our children?
Any great nation throughout history has been great at making things. So if the United States continues to allow its manufacturing base to erode at a staggering pace, how in the world can the U.S. continue to consider itself to be a great nation? We have created the biggest debt bubble in the history of the world in an effort to maintain a very high standard of living, but the current state of affairs is not anywhere close to sustainable. Every single month America goes into more debt and every single month America gets poorer.
So what happens when the debt bubble pops?
The deindustrialization of the United States should be a top concern for every man, woman and child in the country. But sadly, most Americans do not have any idea what is going on around them. For people like that, take this article and print it out and hand it to them. Perhaps what they will read below will shock them badly enough to awaken them from their slumber. The following are 19 facts about the deindustrialization of America that will blow your mind....

1. The United States has lost approximately 42,400 factories since 2001. About 75 percent of those factories employed over 500 people when they were still in operation.
2. Dell Inc. (DELL), one of America’s largest manufacturers of computers, has announced plans to dramatically expand its operations in China with an investment of over $100 billion over the next decade.
3. Dell has announced that it will be closing its last large U.S. manufacturing facility in Winston-Salem, North Carolina in November. Approximately 900 jobs will be lost.
4. In 2008, 1.2 billion cellphones were sold worldwide. So how many of them were manufactured inside the United States? Zero.
5. According to a new study conducted by the Economic Policy Institute, if the U.S. trade deficit with China continues to increase at its current rate, the U.S. economy will lose over half a million jobs this year alone.
6. As of the end of July, the U.S. trade deficit with China had risen 18 percent compared to the same time period a year ago.
7. The United States has lost a total of about 5.5 million manufacturing jobs, since October 2000.
8. According to Tax Notes, between 1999 and 2008, employment at the foreign affiliates of U.S. parent companies increased an astounding 30 percent to 10.1 million. During that exact same time period, U.S. employment at American multinational corporations declined 8 percent to 21.1 million.
9. In 1959, manufacturing represented 28 percent of U.S. economic output. In 2008, it represented 11.5 percent.
10. Ford Motor Company (F) recently announced the closure of a factory that produces the Ford Ranger in St. Paul, Minnesota. Approximately 750 good paying middle class jobs are going to be lost because making Ford Rangers in Minnesota does not fit in with Ford's new "global" manufacturing strategy.
11. As of the end of 2009, less than 12 million Americans worked in manufacturing. The last time less than 12 million Americans were employed in manufacturing was in 1941.
12. In the United States today, consumption accounts for 70 percent of GDP. Of this 70 percent, over half is spent on services.
13. The United States has lost a whopping 32 percent of its manufacturing jobs since the year 2000.
14. In 2001, the United States ranked fourth in the world in per capita broadband Internet use. Today it ranks 15th.
15. Manufacturing employment in the U.S. computer industry is actually lower in 2010 than it was in 1975.
16. Printed circuit boards are used in tens of thousands of different products. Asia now produces 84 percent of them worldwide.
17. The United States spends approximately $3.90 on Chinese goods for every $1 that the Chinese spend on goods from the United States.
18. One prominent economist is projecting that the Chinese economy will be three times larger than the U.S. economy by the year 2040.
19. The U.S. Census Bureau says that 43.6 million Americans are now living in poverty and according to them, that is the highest number of poor Americans in the 51 years that records have been kept.

So how many tens of thousands more factories do we need to lose before we do something about it? How many millions more Americans are going to become unemployed before we all admit that we have a very, very serious problem on our hands?
How many more trillions of dollars are going to leave the country before we realize that we are losing wealth at a pace that is killing our economy? How many once great manufacturing cities are going to become rotting war zones like Detroit before we understand that we are committing national economic suicide?
The deindustrialization of America is a national crisis. It needs to be treated like one. America is in deep, deep trouble folks. It is time to wake up.

About the author: Michael T. Snyder

Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia and has two law degrees from the University of Florida. He is an attorney that has worked for some of the largest and most prominent law firms in Washington D.C. and who now resides outside of... More

The New Poor? Let's not join that Club!

Conversations from the Corner Office.
Re-posted by Rick Irrgang
09.21.10

I ran accross a great article in the New Yor Times this morning. It made me realize just how close to trouble we may be and we don't even know. Would having a plan "B" in this economy be a good idea. I'm thinking yes and hope you do too. Please read this very interesting article on "The New Poor"
If this sounds worrysome, let's talk. Julia and I do have a plan be and it's not being a Wal-Mart Greeter. Let's do something together. When done reading this you may want to listen to the great audio at the top of this blog. Let's create weath!

Patricia Reid is not in her 70s, an age when many Americans continue to work. She is not even in her 60s. She is just 57.

But four years after losing her job she cannot, in her darkest moments, escape a nagging thought: she may never work again.
College educated, with a degree in business administration, she is experienced, having worked for two decades as an internal auditor and analyst at Boeing before losing that job.
But that does not seem to matter, not for her and not for a growing number of people in their 50s and 60s who desperately want or need to work to pay for retirement and who are starting to worry that they may be discarded from the work force — forever.

Since the economic collapse, there are not enough jobs being created for the population as a whole, much less for those in the twilight of their careers.

Of the 14.9 million unemployed, more than 2.2 million are 55 or older. Nearly half of them have been unemployed six months or longer, according to the Labor Department. The unemployment rate in the group — 7.3 percent — is at a record, more than double what it was at the beginning of the latest recession.

After other recent downturns, older people who lost jobs fretted about how long it would take to return to the work force and worried that they might never recover their former incomes. But today, because it will take years to absorb the giant pool of unemployed at the economy's recent pace, many of these older people may simply age out of the labor force before their luck changes.

Patricia Reid, 57, lost her job at Boeing four years ago and has struggled to find a new position.

For Ms. Reid, it has been four years of hunting — without a single job offer. She buzzes energetically as she describes the countless applications she has lobbed through the Internet, as well as the online courses she is taking to burnish her software skills.
Still, when she is pressed, her can-do spirit falters.

"There are these fears in the background, and they are suppressed," said Ms. Reid, who is now selling some of her jewelry and clothes online and is late on some credit card payments. "I have had nightmares about becoming a bag lady," she said. "It could happen to anyone. So many people are so close to it, and they don't even realize it."

Being unemployed at any age can be crushing. But older workers suspect their resumes often get shoved aside in favor of those from younger workers. Others discover that their job-seeking skills — as well as some technical skills sought by employers — are rusty after years of working for the same company.

Many had in fact anticipated working past conventional retirement ages to gird themselves financially for longer life spans, expensive health care and reduced pension guarantees.

The most recent recession has increased the need to extend working life. Home values, often a family's most important asset, have been battered. Stock portfolios are only now starting to recover. According to a Gallup poll in April, more than a third of people not yet retired plan to work beyond age 65, compared with just 12 percent in 1995.

Older workers who lose their jobs could pose a policy problem if they lose their ability to be self-sufficient. "That's what we should be worrying about," said Carl E. Van Horn, professor of public policy and director of the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development at Rutgers University, "what it means to this class of the new unemployables, people who have been cast adrift at a very vulnerable part of their career and their life."

Forced early retirement imposes an intense financial strain, particularly for those at lower incomes. The recession and its aftermath have already pushed down some older workers. In figures released last week by the Census Bureau, the poverty rate among those 55 to 64 increased to 9.4 percent in 2009, from 8.6 percent in 2007.

But even middle-class people who might skate by on savings or a spouse's income are jarred by an abrupt end to working life and to a secure retirement.

"That's what I spent my whole life in pursuit of, was security," Ms. Reid said. "Until the last few years, I felt very secure in my job."

As an auditor, Ms. Reid loved figuring out the kinks in a manufacturing or parts delivery process. But after more than 20 years of commuting across Puget Sound to Boeing, Ms. Reid was exhausted when she was let go from her $80,000-a-year job.

Stunned and depressed, she sent out resumes, but figured she had a little time to recover. So she took vacations to Turkey and Thailand with her husband, who is a home repairman. She sought chiropractic treatments for a neck injury and helped nurse a priest dying of cancer.

Most of her days now are spent in front of a laptop, holed up in a lighthouse garret atop the house that her husband, Denny Mielock, built in the 1990s on a breathtaking piece of property overlooking the sound.

As she browses the job listings that clog her e-mail in-box, she refuses to give in to her fears. "If I let myself think like that all the time," she said, "I could not even bear getting out of bed in the morning."

With her husband's home repair business pummeled by the housing downturn, the bills are mounting. Although the couple do not have a mortgage on their 3,000-square-foot house, they pay close to $7,000 a year in property taxes. The roof is leaking. Their utility bills can be $300 a month in the winter, even though they often keep the thermostat turned down to 50 degrees.

They could try to sell their home, but given the depressed housing market, they are reluctant.

"We are circling the drain here, and I am bailing like hell," said Ms. Reid, emitting an incongruous cackle, as if laughter is the only response to her plight. "But the boat is still sinking."

It is not just the finances that have destabilized her life.

Her husband worries that she isolates herself and that she does not socialize enough. "We've both been hard workers our whole lives," said Mr. Mielock, 59. Ms. Reid sometimes rose just after 3 a.m. to make the hourlong commute to Boeing's data center in Bellevue and attended night school to earn a master's in management information systems.

"A job is more than a job, you know," Mr. Mielock said. "It's where you fit in society."

Here in the greater Seattle area, a fifth of those claiming extended unemployment benefits are 55 and older.

To help seniors polish their job-seeking skills, WorkSource, a local consortium of government and nonprofit groups, recently began offering seminars. On a recent morning, 14 people gathered in a windowless conference room at a local community college to get tips on how to age-proof their resumes and deflect questions about being overqualified.

Motivational posters hung on one wall, bearing slogans like "Failure is the path of least persistence."

Using PowerPoint slides, Liz Howland, the chipper but no-nonsense session leader, projected some common myths about older job-seekers on a screen: "Older workers are less capable of evaluating information, making decisions and problem-solving" or "Older workers are rigid and inflexible and have trouble adapting to change."

Ms. Howland, 61, ticked off the reasons those statements were inaccurate. But a clear undercurrent of anxiety ran through the room. "Is it really true that if you have the energy and the passion that they will overlook the age factor?" asked a 61-year-old man who had been laid off from a furniture maker last October.

Gallows humor reigned. As Ms. Howland — who suggested that applicants remove any dates older than 15 years from their resume — advised the group on how to finesse interview questions like "When did you have the job that helped you develop that skill?" one out-of-work journalist deadpanned: "How about 'during the 20th century?'"

During a break, Anne Richard, who declined to give her age, confessed she was afraid she would not be able to work again after losing her contract as a house director at a University of Washington sorority in June. Although she had 20 years of experience as an office clerk in Chattanooga, Tenn., she feared her technology skills had fallen behind.

"I don't feel like I can compete with kids who have been on computers all their lives," said Ms. Richard, who was sleeping on the couch of a couple she had met at church and contemplating imminent homelessness.

Older people who lose their jobs take longer to find work. In August, the average time unemployed for those 55 and older was slightly more than 39 weeks, according to the Labor Department, the longest of any age group. That is much worse than in August 1983, also after a deep recession, when someone unemployed in that age group spent an average of 27.5 weeks finding work.

At this year's pace of an average of 82,000 new jobs a month, it will take at least eight more years to create the 8 million positions lost during the recession. And that does not even allow for population growth.

Advocates for the elderly worry that younger people are more likely to fill the new jobs as well.

"I do think the longer someone is out of work, the more employers are going to question why it is that someone hasn't been able to find work," said Sara Rix, senior strategic policy adviser at AARP, the lobbying group for seniors. "Their skills have atrophied for one thing, and technology changes so rapidly that even if nothing happened to the skills that you have, they may become increasingly less relevant to the jobs that are becoming available."

In four years of job hunting, Ms. Reid has discovered that she is no longer technologically proficient. In one of a handful of interviews she has secured, for an auditing position at the Port of Seattle, she learned that the job required skills in PeopleSoft, financial software she had never used. She assumes that deficiency cost her the job.

Ms. Reid is still five years away from being eligible for Social Security. But even then, she would be drawing early, which reduces monthly payments. Taking Social Security at 62 means a retiree would receive a 25 percent lower monthly payout than if she worked until 66.

Ms. Reid is in some ways luckier than others. Boeing paid her a six-month severance, and she has health care benefits that cover her and her husband for $40 a month.

And she admits some regrets: she had a $180,000 balance in her 401(k) account, and paid $80,000 in penalties and taxes when she cashed it out early. She did not rein in her expenses right away. And now, her $500-a-week unemployment benefits have been exhausted.

She has since cut back, forgoing Nordstrom shopping sprees and theater subscriptions, but also cutting out red meat at home and putting off home repairs.

In order to qualify for accounting posts, she is taking an online training course in QuickBooks, a popular accounting software used by small businesses. She recently signed up for a tax course at an H&R Block tax preparation office in Seattle.

And she is plugging ahead with her current plan: to send out 600 applications to accounting firms in the area, offering her services for the next tax season. Eventually, she wants to open her own business.

With odd jobs and her husband's — albeit shriveled — earnings, she could stagger along. For now, she stitches together an income by gardening for neighbors, helping fellow church members with their computers, and participating in Internet surveys for as little as $5 apiece.

"You don't necessarily have to go through the door," Ms. Reid said. "You can go around it and go under it. I can be very creative. I think that I will eventually manage to pull this together."

Millions of lost jobs. Many will never return

Conversations from the Corner Office
Posted by Rick Irrgang. 
I found a great article on the current job market in the U.S. Before you read on, ask yourself a few questions.
Is your job secure? 
Are you one of the millions who no longer have a job? 
If there would be a way to add to or replace the income you have now, would you be interested in taking a look? 
Please scroll back to the top of this page and spend a few minutes listening to and watching our short video. Then come back and read the following post. 

By Christopher S. Rugaber

updated 5/13/2010 4:10:49 PM ET

 

Millions of jobs lost, many may never return
Fewer construction workers will be needed. Don't expect as many interior designers or advertising copywriters, either. Retailers will get by with leaner staffs.
The economy is strengthening. But millions of jobs lost in the recession could be gone for good.
And unlike in past recessions, jobs in the beleaguered manufacturing sector aren't the only ones likely lost forever. What sets the Great Recession apart is the variety of jobs that may not return.
That helps explain why economists think it will take at least five years for the economy to regain the 8.2 million jobs wiped out by the recession — longer than in any other recovery since World War II.
It means that even as the economy strengthens, more Americans could face years out of work. Already, the percentage of the labor force unemployed for six months or longer is 4.3 percent. That's the highest rate on records dating to 1948.
Behind the trend are the cutbacks businesses made in the recession to make up for a loss of customers. To sustain earnings, they became more productive: They found ways to produce the same level of goods or services with fewer workers. Automation, global competition and technological efficiencies helped solidify the trend.
Diminished home equity and investment accounts have made shoppers more cautious, too. And their frugality could endure well into the recovery. That's why fewer retail workers, among others, will likely be needed.
Among those whose former jobs may be gone for good are:

• Julie Weber of Milwaukee, who designed office cubicles for nearly seven years. She lost her job about a year ago. Since then, she's been able to find only part-time work outside her field. Interior design was hammered by the real estate downturn. "My hope for getting back into the industry is not very high," says Weber, 29.
• Erik Proulx, 38, a former advertising copywriter in Boston, who finds more companies are turning to social media and viral marketing and are less drawn to agencies that focus on traditional TV and print ad campaigns. Proulx was laid off in October 2008 — the third time an employer had cut his position or had closed. He no longer wants to rejoin the industry. Proulx has started a blog to help other unemployed ad professionals network.
• Louis DiFilippo, 30, who decided to study information technology after losing his job managing a gourmet food store in Washington, D.C. After six months of unemployment, he embraced a career with more stability. He now works on computer network security for the Navy. "I'm much happier now," he said.

More than one-third of chief financial officers at 620 big companies surveyed in March by Duke University and CFO magazine said they didn't expect to restore their payrolls to pre-recession levels for at least three years. Nearly all cited higher productivity and tepid consumer spending.
"Companies have just figured out, 'We didn't want to fire people ... but now that they're gone, we've realized that we can get by without them,'" said John Graham, a Duke finance professor who directed the survey.
Productivity grew at an annual rate of 6.3 percent in the year ending in March, the Labor Department said this month. It was the largest increase in 48 years, though most economists think that pace isn't sustainable.
In the long run, more productive workers raise standards of living: Companies can pay more without inflating prices. But in the short run, high productivity delays hiring.
U.S. employers did add 290,000 jobs in April. The unemployment rate rose to 9.9 percent, though, because 805,000 people without jobs poured into the labor force to seek work.
Three industries, in particular, where many jobs may not be coming back are retailing, manufacturing and advertising.
Retailers have lost 1.2 million, or 7.5 percent, of jobs that existed before the recession, according to Labor Department data. Circuit City and Linens & Things have collapsed. Starbucks closed nearly 800 U.S. stores. Robert Yerex, an economist at Kronos, a work force management company, estimates 20 percent of those jobs are never coming back.
Manufacturing has shed 2.1 million jobs, or 16 percent of its total, since the recession began. Goodyear Tire & Rubber and Boeing Co. laid off a combined 15,700 people during the recession. General Motors eliminated 65,000 through buyouts and layoffs. And as Americans buy fewer cars and homes, more than 1 million jobs in the auto, steel, furniture and other manufacturing industries won't return, according to estimates by Moody's Analytics.
Advertising and PR agencies have lost 65,000 jobs, or about 14 percent of the pre-recession total. Moody's Analytics estimates those industries will lose even more within five years.
In addition, a consolidated airline industry has shed layers of jobs that won't likely return. Delta Air Lines earlier this year spread out departure times for flights from its Cincinnati hub, rather than bunching them at peak travel times. That way, it could operate from one concourse rather than two, said Kent Landers, a spokesman. The change allowed a Delta subsidiary, Regional Elite Airline Services, to cut more than 700 baggage handling and other ground services jobs.
More than half the 15.3 million people out of work in April said they regard their layoff as permanent, the Labor Department said. That's the highest proportion on records dating to 1967. In previous recessions, workers often endured only temporary layoffs: Their employers would recall them once business picked up.
Caterpillar Inc. has resumed hiring after laying off 19,000 full-time workers during the recession, thanks to rising demand for its construction and mining equipment. But most of the new jobs will be overseas. Of the 9,000 hires CEO Jim Owens said Caterpillar plans to make this year, only 3,000 will be in the U.S.
Many economists say eventually, companies won't be able to squeeze any more work out of their employees. That would force employers to step up hiring.
But Janet Yellen, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, cautions that this won't happen anytime soon. She believes corporate America remains in the early stages of a drive for greater efficiencies.
"We may be in store for ... high productivity growth for some time," she said in a speech this year. "If so, the rate of job creation will be frustratingly slow."

MOTIVE-ation

Conversations From The Corner Office:
Re-posted from Richard Brooke's Blog.
Julia and I hope you all are having a great weekend. How is your business going?
Do you think it could be doing better? Are you really in your business or just sitting on the side lines?
Take a few minutes of your day and give this recent post a good read.
Julia and I have re-committed ourselves to helping people live their lives on their terms. This short blog really helped cement the deal.




MOTIVE-ation
Posted By: Richard B. Brooke
 Date Posted: June 4, 2010
SIGN A CONTRACT
INVEST MONEY
    (Perhaps that you don’t really have to risk.)
MEET NEW PEOPLE
INVEST TIME
    (Perhaps that you don’t really have.)
STAKE YOUR REPUTATION ON A PRODUCT OR SERVICE
    (And a company you don’t really know.)
ASK YOUR “NETWORK” TO TAKE A LOOK
    (Risk them saying “No” and, “You are rude to even ask.”)
All of the above are things a new distributor must do – and a lot more – to venture successfully into a new business. All of these actions carry a burden. They are hard … harder for some than others. They take physical effort, but more directly they take emotional effort.
As the business grows the list of activities grows to include travel, training, leadership, personal growth and more financial and time investment. All of this for an opportunity most new distributors are not sure will work … many are even sure it will not.
Every time we imagine doing something new or “hard,” we imagine (fantasize in our mind) what it will be like. Sure, we think of the endeavor itself – like investing money – but then we imagine what it will really be like to write that check or tap that already too-high credit card. We imagine how it will add to our stress, add to uncomfortable conversations with our spouse, and add to our debt load.
As we imagine, we feel the associated emotion. We feel it in every fiber of our body. It instantly changes our body chemistry. It changes our mood, our eyes and our voice. It shrinks us, making us small, both physically and emotionally. We become weak and cannot move past it. This is our Vision. And we act and attract in accordance with it.
Once you know this, you know WHY people shrink around our offer. Perhaps it is the words we choose to describe it. Perhaps it is our inability to paint an inspiring picture. Perhaps we are not clear how their imagination kills it for them. Perhaps they simply do not understand it and can only articulate their uncertainty by saying: “I don’t know anyone.”
So WHY would anyone pursue a new business with the passion and confidence required to pull it off? They won’t, unless they know WHY. And it is not enough to know WHY as a “thing,” like more money to pay off debts or cover that ever-escalating mortgage payment. To be able to name the “thing” is not enough. Our imagination muscle is far more inclined to “work out” the negative, and much less inclined to “work out” the positive.
Belief is the fire that crystallizes our fantasies, making them Visions. When we believe what we imagine, we drill it deeply by telling ourselves everything about it and feeling everything about it. It is much easier to believe something new will not work. It is so much easier to believe that more debt is bad and that risk is bad. Those thoughts immediately become Visions that compel us.
The reason anyone would take the risk and endure some pain, is to enjoy the feelings of success. Success is different for all of us. For some it may be free time. For others it may be new relationships or winning in competition. And for others, it may be financial abundance. We are all made up of a different blend of these values. The challenge we must overcome is mastering what those values are for us personally, and for everyone to whom we offer our opportunity. Without this mastery we are left to recruit by the numbers … and the numbers are not encouraging at all.
Roughly …

• 1% of us enjoy what we would define for ourselves as extraordinary success.
• 4% of us feel we are on a solid path to it.
• 45% of us have struggled for so long that we have rationalized how our lot in life is acceptable. In other words, we have given up.
• 50% of us never even got started, and we blame the rest of the world for our failures.

So if you are going to rely on the MOTIVE-ation of those you prospect, you are going to have to recruit 100 people to get five to even look at it in a positive light. Maybe two or three will pursue it, and maybe only one will create the kind of success you and they want.
Whoever said: “You cannot motivate other people” did not understand the role of a Leader. Leaders do motivate other people. They have to in order to have anyone to lead.
And here is how they do it …
It starts with Values, both imposed and core.
Imposed Values are those values our parents and society have pressed into our consciousness as having to be “valuable.” Our interpretation around these values is that if we don’t have them, we are bad people. Imposed values do motivate; they are limiting, but they are better than nothing.
Core Values are those values that define our own authentic, spiritual self (nothing to do with religion). These are the values we would love to express in life if we felt we had permission. Most people never discover their full set of core values. You can help them do so. Core Values are the truth about you and me. And our truth sets us free. Free to rock the world with our unique power and passion.
You can start the process of MOTIVE-ation by asking lots of curiosity questions. Not as though you are interviewing people, but rather conveying a genuine interest in knowing who they are, both at an imposed level and at their core. When you know the difference between imposed values and core values and you LISTEN with your heart, you can hear the difference in people. You can hear the passion, the energy, the heat in their voice as they talk about what is important to them.
Listen with your heart, not your head (or your values). And listen for the heat. When you hear the heat, drill down. That is where the “gold” lies buried. This is a process that can go on for years. And here is how it starts the motivation process:
First, when you become this kind of leader for others, you become someone unique in their lives. There are probably only a handful of people that have ever been so interested in them … interested at a heart level … unconditionally. Their mother and anyone that has ever fallen in love with them qualify. And you now fall into that category as well. People will open up to you because deep down all any of us really wants … more than fancy cars or homes or status … is to be known, accepted and loved anyway.
They will feel heard as you ask questions like:
Where do you live?
What do you like about it?
What don’t you like about it?
Where would you love to live?
What about that place does it for you?
What do you do for work?
What do you like about it?
What don’t you like about it?
What would you really love to do?
What about that does it for you?
Tell me about your family.
What do you love most about them?
What worries or frustrations do you have around them?
What would you love most to do for them?
If you could spend more time with them doing something, what would it be?
What do you do in your free time?
What about that is important to you?
What would you do if money were no object?
What would you do if you won the lottery or inherited a few million dollars?
What would you do first?
What would you do around work?
What would you do about where you live?
What would you do for your family?
What would you do with your hobbies, recreation and special interests?
What would you do if you learned you only had a few years to live?
What would you do if you learned your spouse or a child only had a few years to live?
What would you do around any of the above, if your parents wholeheartedly approved?
Every time you feel the heat, drill down and ask: “How would that make you feel?” Guide them to feel it.
These questions, and others you may intuit along the way, lead others to drill down into their own hearts to think about what is important to them. As they think about it, as they talk to themselves about it, they start to feel what it would feel like to experience it. Their body chemistry changes. Their mood changes. Their eyes and tone of voice tell a different story. Their energy changes and, most importantly, their power and passion for acting and attracting is dialed up a notch. They are, in this moment, En-VISION-ing something important to them and they are MOTIVE-ated to bring it to fruition.
In these moments they are not thinking and feeling anything about the risk, or the debt, or the fear of failure. It is not possible for the mind to hold two opposing thoughts at the same time. As long as they keep thinking about and feeling the picture you guided them to, they will be MOTIVE-ated to accomplish it.
So how do we keep them engaged? BELIEF.
It is one thing to think of success. It is quite another to believe in it so that your thinking of it is a natural, normal thought habit … something that is with you all the time, guiding your actions and attractions.
Belief is accomplished by the following:
Experience
If we have experienced this vision before, then we believe in it. If your prospect has earned $10,000 a month in a similar opportunity, then they will tend to believe they can, and will, do it again. In this case, you don’t have to do much motivating.
Spaced Repetition
The subconscious and emotional mind cannot tell the difference between a real experience and one that has been vividly imagined. When you imagine success over and over and over and over again, it gradually grows as a truth in your heart and mind. As a leader, every time you guide someone to think about their vision, every time you ask them to look at their pictures, to read their affirmations, to talk to you about how it will feel; every time you do this, you are motivating them and leading them one step closer to believing it themselves. And every time they do these things on their own, they are leading themselves to do the same.
Proof and Logic
Our conscious mind responds to proof and logic. These can be in the form of: testimonials from other people, business plans that makes sense logically, income calculators, stories, positive group dynamics (it is easy to believe something will work when you are in a meeting of believers for two or three days), and training (understanding how something works helps the conscious mind believe). As leaders we can facilitate all of these, and we must.
As we discover along with our followers what our own core values are, and craft our visions around them, we learn to believe they are inevitable. Then we become one of those very fortunate top 5-percenters who already bathe in our abundance or are on the fast track to the bath house.
Consider, these questions:
If everyone you might ever prospect knew what you know about your opportunity, would they be at least interested? What percentage would be interested? (I say at least 50 percent.)
If you learned some of the most important things (feelings) MISSING in these people’s lives, and you showed them exactly how they could get them, what percentage of them would give it a go? (I say at least 50 percent of the 50 percent.)
That means 25 percent of everyone you now know, or will ever meet, will become new personally sponsored representatives. That is at least 50 to 100 new personally sponsored distributors a year. You only need to do that for a year or two to explode an empire that could create a lifetime of income for you.
Learn the motives that will propel YOU to lead with passion and power. Learn the motives of everyone you talk to about your opportunity. Develop the habit of teaching yourself and all of your people how to believe success is inevitable. And you and your team’s success will clock Mach II velocity.

Americans "bombarded" with cancer sources:

Conversations from the Corner Office:
Posted by Rick Irrgang
A well needed day off from our normal busy days. The weather, perfect.
A business partner of ours forwarded us this fantastic piece on Cancer sources. We are so fortunate to have Neways in our lives, protecting us and our families from harmful ingredients in our personal care products. Please take a few minutes from your busy day to read today's post.
To Your Health


Americans "bombarded" with cancer sources: report


(Reuters) - Americans are being "bombarded" with cancer-causing chemicals and radiation and the federal government must do far more to protect them, presidential cancer advisers said on Thursday.



Although most experts agree that as many as two-thirds of cancer cases are caused by lifestyle choices like smoking, poor diet and lack of exercise, the two-member panel said many avoidable cancers were also caused by pollution, radon gas from the soil and medical imaging scans.

"The incidence of some cancers, including some most common among children, is increasing for unexplained reasons," wrote the two panel members, Dr. LaSalle Leffall, professor of surgery at Howard University College of Medicine in Washington and Margaret Kripke, an emeritus professor at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Cancer is the No. 2 killer of Americans, after heart disease. Kripke and Leffall, both appointed by President George W. Bush, decided in 2008 to focus a report on potential environmental links to cancer.

"The American people -- even before they are born -- are bombarded continually with myriad combinations of these dangerous exposures," they wrote in a letter to President Barack Obama at top of the report.

"The panel urges you most strongly to use the power of your office to remove the carcinogens and other toxins from our food, water, and air that needlessly increase healthcare costs, cripple our nation's productivity, and devastate American lives."

A White House spokesman indicated he had not yet seen the report and the National Cancer Institute declined comment.

KNOWN RISKS

The American Cancer Society said the report downplayed known risks that cause most cases of cancer including tobacco, obesity, alcohol, infections, hormones and sunlight.

"The report is most provocative when it restates hypotheses as if they were established facts," the society's Dr. Michael Thun said in a statement.

"For example, its conclusion that 'the true burden of environmentally (pollution) induced cancer has been grossly underestimated' does not represent scientific consensus."

The American Chemistry Council, an industry group, agreed and said the report underemphasized prevention efforts.

The report, available at pcp.cancer.gov, offered some of its own advice to consumers.

For instance, the report said that although large studies have found no links between cell phone use and cancer, people would be prudent to wear headsets and make calls quickly.

The report delighted environmental groups that have been pressing for more regulation of chemicals. "It is very gratifying to see this remarkable report that addresses those concerns," said Julia Brody, executive director of the Silent Spring Institute.

"The 40-year war on cancer has been called for what it is ... a failure," Jeanne Rizzo, president and chief executive of the Breast Cancer Fund, which advocates about links between chemicals and breast cancer, told reporters in a telephone briefing.

New Jersey Democratic Senator Frank Lautenberg said he hoped the report would help boost support for a bill requiring closer regulation of chemicals.

"My Safe Chemicals Act will require testing of all chemicals, and take substances off the market if the manufacturer cannot prove they are safe," he said.

(Editing by Eric Walsh)

For information to create a healthy home, free of potentially harmful ingredients, please call 928-830-2248 or email Rick and Julia at info@lifesafeandhealthy.net
Visit us online at www.livesafeandhealthy.net

More great news from Omama Bama. Who's In Charge of Who's In Charge?

Conversations from the corner Office
Posted by Rick Irrgang
04.05.10

Interesting news release from our closet smoker President Omama bama.

For Immediate Release, March 28, 2010

Contact: Tierra Curry, Center for Biological Diversity, (928) 522-3681

Obama Puts Pesticide Pusher in Charge of Agricultural Trade Relations

WASHINGTON— Sidestepping a stalled Senate confirmation vote, yesterday President Obama recess-appointed Islam Siddiqui to be chief agricultural negotiator in the office of the U.S. trade representative. Dr. Siddiqui’s nomination was held up in the Senate and was opposed by the Center for Biological Diversity and more than 80 other environmental, small-farm, and consumer groups. More than 90,000 concerned citizens contacted the White House and Senate to oppose the nomination. Siddiqui is a former pesticide lobbyist and is currently vice president of science and regulatory affairs at CropLife America, a biotech and pesticide trade group that lobbies to weaken environmental laws.

“Dr. Siddiqui’s confirmation is a step backward,” said Tierra Curry, a scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity. “His appointment ensures the perpetuation of pesticide- and fossil-fuel-intensive policies, which undermine global food security and imperil public health and wildlife.”

As undersecretary for marketing and regulatory programs at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Siddiqui oversaw the development of the first national organic labeling standards, which allowed sewage sludge-fertilized, genetically modified, and irradiated food to be labeled as organic before public outcry forced more stringent standards. Siddiqui has derided the European Union’s ban on hormone-treated beef and has vowed to pressure the European Union to accept more genetically modified crops.

CropLife America, formerly known as the National Agricultural Chemicals Association, lobbies to weaken the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act, claiming that pesticides are not pollutants because of their intended beneficial effect and that pesticides positively impact endangered species. The group has lobbied to allow pesticides to be tested on children and to allow the continued use of persistent organic pollutants and ozone-depleting chemicals. It also launched a petition asking Michelle Obama to use pesticides in the organic White House garden and fought county initiatives in California banning genetically modified foods.

What's That? Bad Stuff in Mainstream Personal Care Products?

Conversations from the Corner Office.

Posted by Rick Irrgang.

Green Patriot and OCA Expose 1,4 Dioxane in Household Products

 

March 12, at a press conference held adjacent to the Natural Products Expo West, the Green Patriot Working Group (GPWG), led by environmental health consumer advocate David Steinman, and the Organic Consumers Association announced that Procter and Gamble (P&G) and the Green Patriot have reached an agreement in principle that P&G will reformulate its top-selling Herbal Essences brand to reduce levels of the carcinogenic contaminant 1,4-dioxane. The press conference also announced new 1,4-dioxane test results for twenty laundry detergents, of which notably some of the most popular mainstream brands - including Dial, Church & Dwight Co. and Procter & Gamble - had the highest levels overall.

For about the same price as off the shelf, harmful personal care products, you and your family can use safe and effective Neways Products, delivered right to your home. Just think, you'll never have to read a label again and you will be using the safest products on the planet. Endorsed by the Cancer Prevention Coalition and Dr Samuel Epstein. For more information email info@LiveSafeAndHealthy.net or call 928-830-2251.